DSpace Repository

The Darwinian Theory of Evolution and Creation Account of Genesis: Contradiction or Complementary?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Boaheng (PhD), Isaac
dc.date.accessioned 2025-01-30T12:04:02Z
dc.date.available 2025-01-30T12:04:02Z
dc.date.issued 2024-05-24
dc.identifier.citation BIBLIOGRAPHY Bergman, Jerry and Howe, George. Vestigial Organs Are Fully Functional: A History and Evaluation of the Vestigial Organ Origins Concept, Terre Haute, Ind.: Creation Research Society, 1990. Boaheng, Isaac. Is the Bible Really the Word of God? Accra: Noyam, 2024. Dawkins, Richard. The Blind Watchmaker, Cambridge, 1986. Dembski and Wells, Design of life. As quoted Groothuis, Douglas. Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 2011. Dickerson, Richard E. “Chemical Evolution and the Origin of Life,” Scientific American, Vol. 239, 1978. Fuller and Tippo, College Botany as quoted in Charles C. Ryrie, Basic Theology, Chicago: Moody Press, 1999. Groothuis, Douglas. Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith, Illinois: Intervarsity Press, 2011. Jamieson, Robert. Fausset, A. R. and Brown, David. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1978. Keil and Delitcsh Genesis, http://207.44.232.113/~bible/comment/ot/k&d/gen/gen-BkMrk.html, Kerkut, G. A. Implications of Evolution, in Martin, The Evolution of a Creationist, Texas: Biblical Discipleship Publishers, 2002. Martin, Jobe. The Evolution of a Creationist, Texas: Biblical Discipleship Publishers, 2002. Mayr, Ernst. What evolution is. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2002. McDowell, Josh. Answers Five Tough Questions, Illinois: Tyndale House Pub., 199 Metcalf, C. L. and Flint, W. P. Destructive and Useful Insects, 4th ed. As quoted by Martin, Jobe. The Evolution of a Creationist, Texas: Biblical Discipleship Publishers, 2002. Stanford E. Murrell An Introductory Study of Systematic Theology. Np: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2013. Norman L. Geisler, Systematic Theology, Minneapolis: Bethany House. O'Rourke, J. E. “Pragmatism versus Materialism in Stratigraphy.” American Journal of Science, vol. 276, 1976: 47-55 Ryrie, Charles C. Basic Theology, Chicago: Moody Press, 1999. Thompson, Bert. The scientific case for creation, Alabama: Apologetics Press, Inc., 2004. ABOUT AUTHOR Isaac Boaheng holds a PhD in Theology from the University of the Free State, South Africa. He is a Senior Lecturer in Theology and Christian Ethics at the Christian Service University College, Ghana, and a Research Fellow at the Department of Biblical and Religion Studies, University of the Free State, South Africa. He has many peer-reviewed publications. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2458-7338 | Print 2821-8957
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/30622
dc.description FACULTY/STAFF PUBLICATION en_US
dc.description.abstract ABSTRACT The question of the origin of humans has been fiercely contested for a long period. One perspective is the creation model, which asserts that the Universe and all its components emerged through the deliberate actions of God, driven by design and purpose. Conversely, the evolution model posits that the Universe's formation occurred solely through mechanistic processes, devoid of any supernatural intervention. Narrowing the scope to humanity, the evolution model contends for the gradual evolution of the human species through a process of descent with modification from an ancestor shared with apes, while the creation model proposes the direct creation of humankind by God in his image. Certainly, the implications either model has on human dignity are very important for human existence. Whether God created humankind directly or through evolution from an ape-like ancestor has a bearing on human dignity. It raises, for example, the question as to whose image humanity bears: God’s or apes’? The way one answers this question will definitely affect his or her human-divine and human-human relationships. A literary research approach was used to gather data from books, articles, and dissertations. The data were critically examined to consider the arguments for either side of the debate. It was found out that both biblical and scientific data may allow for variations within a particular species (microevolution) but not the production of one species from another (macroevolution). The findings suggest that the creation model must be accepted with its attendant implications for human dignity. Keywords: Evolution, Creation, Human Dignity, Origin en_US
dc.description.sponsorship CHRISTIAN SERVICE UNIVERSITY en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher CHRISTIAN SERVICE UNIVERSITY en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries 10 Issue;5-May
dc.subject Evolution, Creation, Human Dignity, Origin en_US
dc.title The Darwinian Theory of Evolution and Creation Account of Genesis: Contradiction or Complementary? en_US
dc.title.alternative E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies (ERATS) en_US
dc.type Book en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account