AUDITING AND THE EXPECTATION GAP

NTOW, PATRICK; OSEI DARKOAH, ELMA; NTOW ADJEKUM, HENRY; SARPONG, JOSEPHINE; MANU, BRIGHT

DSpace Home
→
STUDENTS’ FINAL PROJECT (THESIS/DISSERTATION)
→
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS- ST
→
Business Administration -ST
→
View Item

dc.contributor.author	NTOW, PATRICK
dc.contributor.author	OSEI DARKOAH, ELMA
dc.contributor.author	NTOW ADJEKUM, HENRY
dc.contributor.author	SARPONG, JOSEPHINE
dc.contributor.author	MANU, BRIGHT
dc.date.accessioned	2012-11-22T09:28:11Z
dc.date.accessioned	2022-01-20T10:21:48Z
dc.date.available	2012-11-22T09:28:11Z
dc.date.available	2022-01-20T10:21:48Z
dc.date.issued	2012-11-22
dc.identifier.uri	http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3059
dc.description	The credibility of external auditors is increasingly being called into question in many countries around the world, as evidenced by widespread criticism and litigation directed against auditors (Porter, 1993). There is evidence that some of this criticism is based on society's lack of knowledge of company law and auditing standards and a misunderstanding of the fundamental role of the external auditor, which is an expectations gap. The expectation gap is considered to be one of the major issues confronting the accountancy profession in recent times. Users of corporate reports such as investors, journalists, politicians and others expect auditors to detect and report material fraud and irregularities, amongst other things. In response, the profession argues that the public misunderstands the role of the auditor, and that fraud detection and reporting is not a major audit objective. Such divergence in views and beliefs, have created a vacuum between auditors and users of accounting information or stakeholders. The vacuum between these two interest groups is what has been described as expectation gaps. The expectation gap, signifying the difference between what the public expects from an audit and what the auditing profession prefers audit objective to be, has been a recurring issue in the auditing literature (Chandler and Edwards, 1996). The expectation gap has over the years attracted considerable institutional interests. These institutions include; the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, 1978; Chartered Association of Certified Accountants, 1986a, 1986b and the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, 1988 as it is considered to be a threat to effective corporate governance.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	This study discusses the auditor’s independence and audit expectation gap. An independent auditor is essential because of the separation of ownership from the management; the independent factor is the foundation of the public accounting profession and upon its maintenance depends on the profession’s strength and its stature. Auditors have been criticized by many as not been responsible especially in the detection of fraud in many organizations. This is due to the misunderstanding of the roles and function of auditors. The problem has become a burden for auditor as this creates a gap between them and their client and reduces the confidence that exists between them. These are all attributed to the fact that there is less education on the general public about the actual roles and function of an auditor. This study gives an insight into the various aspects of the subject matter and gives recommendations as to how this gap can be bridged or eliminated to bring all stakeholders of financial report together.	en_US
dc.subject	AUDITING	en_US
dc.subject	THE EXPECTATION GAP	en_US
dc.title	AUDITING AND THE EXPECTATION GAP	en_US
dc.title.alternative	A CASE OF THREE SELECTED RURAL BANKS IN THE KUMASI METROPOLIS	en_US
dc.type	Thesis	en_US